Following on from Dr.PeteFamMed — and this may be the naive question:
What a vetting checklist should actually contain, as opposed to a list of things that are easy to fake?
ChrisMacros said:The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.
I do not accept the framing. The question has been narrowed to the version that has a tidy answer, and the part that was dropped is the part the OP actually asked about.
Correct me if the detail matters more than I have assumed.
ChrisMacros said:The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.
True, with the qualification that this is a self-selected group. The people for whom it did not work post less, and that shapes everything we think we know.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsChrisMacros said:The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.
Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion. Almost every disagreement here turns out to be two people measuring different things and comparing the numbers anyway.