Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. Most of what circulates confidently in this community traces back to one summary of one study, and the qualifier was dropped somewhere in the third retelling.

rachel_ABQ said:

Most of what circulates confidently in this community traces back to one summary of one study, and the qualifier was dropped somewhere in the third…

This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud.

Moderator note: a post naming a supplier has been edited. Discuss suppliers in the review sections, not here.

One concrete data point for the thread. Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look. It is a small discipline and it changes what you notice.

Happy to go further on any of that.

Following on from rachel_ABQ — and this may be the naive question:

What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?