Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about. A precise question gets a precise answer; a general one gets everybody’s favourite anecdote.
Following on from ben_calgary — and this may be the naive question:
Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?
Dr.EndoEP said:It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.
Careful with the causal language. Two things moving together in a period when five things changed is not a mechanism, and stating it as one makes the thread less useful to somebody reading it later.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsDr.EndoEP said:It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.
That is right for the common case. Whether it is right for the case being asked about depends on a detail that has not been given.
Moderator note: two posts asking for a source have been merged into one. Please search the thread before asking again. Thread quality here is what the rules are for. Keep it up.