🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsVendor Reviews[REVIEW] Swiss Chems — pricing, COAs, and customer service Page 2

[REVIEW] Swiss Chems — pricing, COAs, and customer service

VendorMark Wed, Jun 3, 2026 at 12:03 PM 7 replies 290 viewsPage 2 of 2
DataDave
Senior Member
1,678
8,901
Apr 2024
Washington
Online
Jun 3, 2026 at 1:53 PM#6
VendorMark said:
Two reports on the same product from two laboratories, four percentage points apart, and no method stated on either.

HPLC results interpretation for certificates of analysis: when you get your Janoshik report back, here's what the numbers mean:

  • Purity %: Should be >97%. Below 95% is concerning.
  • Retention time: Should match reference standard for the peptide
  • Related substances: Degradation products should be <2% total
  • Single impurity: No individual impurity should exceed 1%

My last batch: 99.7% purity, 0.3% total related substances. Clean chromatogram with single sharp peak at expected retention time. Exactly what you want to see.

12 7VendorMark, COA_Karl, MikeFit_NJ and 9 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
hank_denver
Member
278
1,234
Sep 2024
Denver, CO
Jun 3, 2026 at 2:36 PM#7

One thing that is still open after LibrarianMeg’s answer:

Whether a purity figure and a content figure can disagree without one of them being wrong?

Last edited: Jun 3, 2026 at 6:36 PM
11 6raj_cambridge, ingrid_STO, pete_nash and 8 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.RaviCardio
VIP Member
2,890
15,678
Jan 2024
New York, NY
Jun 3, 2026 at 3:19 PM#8
DataDave said:
HPLC results interpretation for certificates of analysis: when you get your Janoshik report back, here's what the numbers mean: Purity %: Should be…

My HPLC chromatogram analysis for certificates of analysis — I sent my batch to Janoshik and here's what the results showed:

Main peak retention time: 16.6 minutes (consistent with semaglutide reference standard)
Peak purity: 98.2%
Related substances: 0.8% (single impurity at 10.4 minutes — likely a synthesis intermediate)
Mass spec: m/z 4113.5 (matches expected molecular weight)

This is a clean result. The mass spec confirmation is particularly important — it proves the molecule is actually semaglutide and not a substitution.

10 5mark_tokyo, hans_munich, jason_sac26 and 7 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
VendorMark
Senior Member
3,456
14,567
Jan 2024
Texas
Online
Jun 3, 2026 at 4:02 PM#9

OP back with an update, since a thread like this is useless without one.

Purity and content being different measurements was the piece I was missing. The vial was overfilled and pure, which is a very different problem from the one I thought I had.

9 4Dr.PeteFamMed, claudia_zurich, nancy_portland and 6 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
labquiet_amy
Senior Member
1,234
6,789
Mar 2024
Cambridge, MA
Jun 3, 2026 at 7:31 PM#10
Dr.RaviCardio said:
My HPLC chromatogram analysis for certificates of analysis — I sent my batch to Janoshik and here's what the results showed: Main peak retention time:…

Agreed, and mass spec answers a question purity does not: identity. High purity tells you one thing dominates the chromatogram, not that it is the molecule you ordered. A mass within about a dalton of expected is the identity check.

5 5pete_manc_UK, anna.melb_AU, mark_tokyo and 2 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

[REVIEW] WWB — 8 months, 6 orders, all Janoshik tested7 replies
[REVIEW] QSC — consistency and pricing, 10+ orders deep5 replies
[REVIEW] GGPeps — 6 orders, all independently tested3 replies
Which vendor should I go with? Side-by-side comparison3 replies
How do you vet a new vendor? My quality checklist9 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register