🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsNutrition & SupplementationProbiotics on GLP-1 — my results so far Page 2

Probiotics on GLP-1 — my results so far

MASHdoc_SA Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 2:59 AM 21 replies 1,344 viewsPage 2 of 5
raj_cambridge
Member
489
2,123
Jun 2024
Cambridge, MA
Nov 11, 2025 at 12:16 PM#6
MASHdoc_SA said:
Distribution matters less than total but it is not nothing.

DEXA scan update relevant to protein intake:

Scanned at months 0, 6, and 12. Here are the body comp numbers:

BaselineMonth 6Month 12
Total mass245 lbs230 lbs202 lbs
Fat mass105 lbs65 lbs52 lbs
Lean mass158 lbs148 lbs149 lbs
Body fat %38%34%21%

Lean mass preserved — actually GAINED 1-2 lbs thanks to progressive overload + 1.5g/kg protein. The protein intake discussion needs to include body comp data, not just scale weight.

21 16SleepFixSam, PurityPaulOR, MaxMetOK and 18 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
ricardo_MIA
Member
378
1,678
Sep 2024
Miami, FL
Nov 11, 2025 at 3:56 PM#7

Following on from TinaHashiRN — and this may be the naive question:

Whether the RDA is the wrong reference entirely during rapid weight loss, and what the actual target should be?

20 15ZaraB_AL, JakeSmashed95, NauseaFreeNow and 17 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
anders_CPH
Senior Member
1,567
7,234
Feb 2024
Copenhagen, DK
Nov 11, 2025 at 7:36 PM#8
raj_cambridge said:
DEXA scan update relevant to protein intake: Scanned at months 0, 6, and 12.

Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion. Almost every disagreement here turns out to be two people measuring different things and comparing the numbers anyway.

Last edited: Nov 11, 2025 at 11:36 PM
19 14AussieAnna, BethLabQueen, ChrisMacros and 16 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
MASHdoc_SA
Member
456
2,345
Aug 2024
San Antonio, TX
Nov 11, 2025 at 11:16 PM#9

Reporting back.

Reporting back — setting the target on reference weight rather than current weight turned an impossible number into a boring one.

Last edited: Nov 12, 2025 at 2:16 AM
18 13LabKate, kate.chem, DataDave and 15 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
JessicaM_2024
Member
823
3,456
Mar 2024
Portland, OR
Nov 12, 2025 at 4:49 PM#10
anders_CPH said:
Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.

Agreed on the target, with the caveat that reference weight and current weight are different numbers. Using current weight at the start of a large loss produces a target that is both unachievable and unnecessary.

Last edited: Nov 12, 2025 at 5:49 PM
18 16kevin_tulsa, Dr.PainCLE, mike_mealprep and 15 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

Protein requirements on GLP-1: systematic review of RDA vs optimal intake8 replies
Micronutrient deficiency risk on GLP-1 — B12, D, iron, zinc, folate10 replies
High-protein meal plans for GLP-1 users — 1500-2000 kcal options9 replies
Meal prep Sunday — weekly high-protein recipes thread9 replies
Creatine monohydrate + GLP-1 — safety and lean mass preservation data14 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register