Jul 28, 2025 at 1:43 PM#21
A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
34 7julia.endo, JessicaM_2024, TomFromTexas and 31 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Aug 3, 2025 at 11:14 PM#22
MikeFit_NJ said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
I read this differently from MikeFit_NJ, on substance rather than tone. The objection nobody has made: this only works if the measurement is doing what we assume it is doing, and that assumption has not been tested here.
Last edited: Aug 4, 2025 at 2:14 AM
35 8NurseKim_ATL, paul_denver, TinaHashiRN and 32 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Aug 10, 2025 at 8:41 AM#23
MikeFit_NJ said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
That is correct as far as it goes, and here is where it stops going. Yes, and the corollary is less popular: if the reasoning holds, it also holds where it produces an answer we do not like.
36 9traveltech_sara, AttorneyGrant, DebRD_ATL and 33 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsAug 16, 2025 at 6:04 PM#24
MikeFit_NJ said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
Bookmarking. The distinction being drawn above is the one nobody else makes.
Last edited: Aug 16, 2025 at 9:04 PM
37 10Dr.Martinez, mike_mod, SarahChen_PharmD and 34 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Aug 23, 2025 at 3:24 AM#25
Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. Most of what circulates confidently in this community traces back to one summary of one study, and the qualifier was dropped somewhere in the third retelling.
38 11dan_philly, MeganSA_TX, LarryQC_SD and 35 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report