hank_denver said:Fair, and it stops being fair at the extremes.
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction.
hank_denver said:Fair, and it stops being fair at the extremes.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions. Agreeing that something happens says nothing about whether it happens enough to act on.
One concrete data point for the thread. One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it. Reconstructing a timeline from memory three months later is how people end up unable to answer the one question that would have resolved it.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsOne thing that is still open after hank_denver’s answer:
Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?
josh_phd_bmore said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
Pushing back on josh_phd_bmore here. This treats a plausible mechanism as a demonstrated one. Plausible is where you start looking, not where you stop.