Following on from ingrid_STO — and this may be the naive question:
Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?
Following on from ingrid_STO — and this may be the naive question:
Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?
Reporting back.
Update: two thirds of the target before midday. Same total, same appetite, and I am hitting it most days now.
dan_philly said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
That is right for the common case. Whether it is right for the case being asked about depends on a detail that has not been given.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsOld thread, but it comes up first when you search for this, so it is worth updating. Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath. An edited-away mistake is invisible to the next person who makes it.
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any. If nothing would, the discussion is not about evidence, and it is better to say so early than to spend nine posts discovering it.