PeptideChemSF said:

Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.

I do not accept the framing. The question has been narrowed to the version that has a tidy answer, and the part that was dropped is the part the OP actually asked about.

If somebody has the primary source to hand I would rather cite it than paraphrase it.

PeptideChemSF said:

Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.

Agreed on the substance. I would put less weight on the timescale, because two months of anything is not enough to distinguish a trend from a wobble.

PeptideChemSF said:

Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.

Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it.

Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about. A precise question gets a precise answer; a general one gets everybody’s favourite anecdote.

roxy_nash said:

It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.

Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction. Nothing to add that would improve it.