🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsVendor Reviews[REVIEW] GGPeps — what worked for you? Page 3

[REVIEW] GGPeps — what worked for you?

sarah_TO Tue, May 6, 2025 at 6:03 PM 14 replies 1,711 viewsPage 3 of 3
Dr.GastroMayo
VIP Member
2,345
13,456
Jan 2024
Mayo Clinic, MN
May 7, 2025 at 10:13 PM#11
EndoResFellow said:
There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.

That is right, and it stops being right at the edges. The general case is well behaved; the interesting cases in this thread are all at the boundary where the general case breaks.

Last edited: May 8, 2025 at 3:13 AM
48 21mike_nyc, VendorMark, COA_Karl and 45 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
greg_boulder
Member
345
1,567
Jul 2024
Boulder, CO
May 8, 2025 at 3:58 PM#12
Dr.LipidDallas said:
Right, and one flattering data point from a group buy is not consistency.

Bookmarking. The distinction being drawn above is the one nobody else makes. Adding it to my notes with a link back to this thread.

Last edited: May 8, 2025 at 5:58 PM
49 22fiona_VT, denise_HTX, raj_cambridge and 46 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
labquiet_amy
Senior Member
1,234
6,789
Mar 2024
Cambridge, MA
May 9, 2025 at 9:43 AM#13
EndoResFellow said:
There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.

I am going to disagree with the direction of travel here. The thread has converged on the tidiest answer rather than the best-supported one, and those are not the same thing.

If somebody has the primary source to hand I would rather cite it than paraphrase it.

50 23LibrarianMeg, bri_stats, pete_manc_UK and 47 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
FDA_TrackerJim
Senior Member
1,567
7,890
Feb 2024
Rockville, MD
May 10, 2025 at 3:29 AM#14

One concrete data point for the thread. Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason. In three months the reason is what you will have forgotten, and the reason is what makes the record worth having.

Last edited: May 10, 2025 at 6:29 AM
1 24Dr.LeslieOBGYN
Reply Quote Save Share Report
mike_mod
Moderator
7,234
19,823
Nov 2023
New York
Online
May 10, 2025 at 9:15 PM#15

Moderator note: a couple of off-topic posts removed. No action needed from anybody.

2 0PurityPaulOR, MaxMetOK
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

[REVIEW] WWB — 8 months, 6 orders, all Janoshik tested7 replies
[REVIEW] QSC — consistency and pricing, 10+ orders deep5 replies
[REVIEW] GGPeps — 6 orders, all independently tested3 replies
Which vendor should I go with? Side-by-side comparison3 replies
How do you vet a new vendor? My quality checklist9 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register