A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?
A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?
PedsEndoPhilly said:Agreed, with the usual condition: that holds for the average and this board is a collection of individuals.
Filing a mild objection. Mild because I might be wrong; an objection because nobody has addressed the case that does not fit. Filing an objection on the n=1 problem. Personal experience is genuine evidence about one person and very weak evidence about anybody else, and this thread keeps promoting the first into the second.
Reporting back.
Closing this out. What actually changed my mind was the point about waiting for a trend instead of reading a single measurement, which is embarrassing in hindsight and worth saying anyway.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemPedsEndoPhilly said:Agreed, with the usual condition: that holds for the average and this board is a collection of individuals.
Bookmarking. The distinction being drawn above is the one nobody else makes.
This was answered several pages up and is worth repeating rather than re-litigating:
There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.