SarahChen_PharmD said:Update: the thing I was blaming turned out not to be the cause.
Second this. Posting only so the count is not one.
SarahChen_PharmD said:Update: the thing I was blaming turned out not to be the cause.
Second this. Posting only so the count is not one.
SarahChen_PharmD said:Update: the thing I was blaming turned out not to be the cause.
Coming at SarahChen_PharmD’s question from a different direction. There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.
If somebody has the primary source to hand I would rather cite it than paraphrase it.
The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath. An edited-away mistake is invisible to the next person who makes it.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsFollowing on from SarahChen_PharmD — and this may be the naive question:
How long did you give it before you decided it was working?
hank_denver said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. This treats a plausible mechanism as a demonstrated one. Plausible is where you start looking, not where you stop.