🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsBuyer Beware⚠ Instagram peptide sellers — zero COAs, zero testing, 100% risk

⚠ Instagram peptide sellers — zero COAs, zero testing, 100% risk

PurityPaulOR Fri, Jun 5, 2026 at 11:26 AM 9 replies 260 viewsPage 1 of 2
PurityPaulOR
Senior Member
1,890
7,890
Mar 2024
Oregon
Jun 5, 2026 at 11:26 AM#1

Posting this as a warning rather than a discussion, and I will edit the post if any of it turns out to be wrong.

I have a certificate reporting 99.2% purity and 6.1mg content on a vial sold as 5mg, and I cannot work out whether those two numbers are consistent or contradictory.

Mass spec answers a question purity does not: identity. High purity tells you one thing dominates the chromatogram, not that it is the molecule you ordered. A mass within about a dalton of expected is the identity check.

What to check: The four things to check on any report, in order: does it name your batch, who commissioned it, what method was used, and does it report content as well as purity. A report failing any of those is weak evidence regardless of the percentage on it.

If your experience contradicts this, say so in the thread — I would rather be corrected here than have people act on a warning that does not hold.

35 5Dr.LeslieOBGYN, MikeNYC_runner and 32 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
MikeFit_NJ
Senior Member
1,567
6,543
Apr 2024
New Jersey
Jun 5, 2026 at 11:33 AM#2
PurityPaulOR said:
I have a certificate reporting 99.2% purity and 6.1mg content on a vial sold as 5mg, and I cannot work out whether those two numbers are consistent or…

PurityPaulOR has the substance of this right. The condition it depends on is worth stating. Inter-laboratory variation comes from real methodological differences, not sloppiness: which reference standard was used and how it was itself calibrated, the gradient and column, the detection wavelength, and where the integration baseline was drawn. A percentage point or two between competent labs is expected. What is not expected is a large gap, and the usual explanation there is that one report is not of the batch in your hand.

34 4marcus_mpls, DeniseRN_TPA, SandraNC_45 and 31 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
LibrarianMeg
Senior Member
1,678
7,890
Mar 2024
Baltimore, MD
Jun 5, 2026 at 11:40 AM#3
PurityPaulOR said:
I have a certificate reporting 99.2% purity and 6.1mg content on a vial sold as 5mg, and I cannot work out whether those two numbers are consistent or…

I am more sceptical of certificates as a category than this thread is. The document tells you about a sample somebody chose to send, at a moment in time, and nothing about the vial in your hand. Independent purchase-and-test is a different quality of evidence and everything else is inference.

33 3julia.endo, JessicaM_2024, TomFromTexas and 30 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Janoshik Analytical — Independent Testing

Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.

Verify Your Peptides

GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. — Direct Manufacturer

Est. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.

Browse GL Biochem
sophie_paris
Member
212
890
Nov 2024
Paris, FR
Jun 5, 2026 at 11:47 AM#4

This one has a reasonably settled answer, so here it is. They are not contradictory, they measure different things, and this is the single most common misreading of a certificate. Purity is a relative area measurement: the main peak as a percentage of total peak area in the chromatogram. Content is an absolute mass measurement against a reference standard. A vial can be 99% pure and contain 6.1mg — pure material, overfilled — or 99% pure and contain 3mg, which is pure material and a short fill. Purity tells you what fraction of what is there is the right molecule; content tells you how much of it there is. You need both, and a certificate with only purity is telling you half the story.

32 2AussieAnna, BethLabQueen, ChrisMacros and 29 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
greg_boulder
Member
345
1,567
Jul 2024
Boulder, CO
Jun 5, 2026 at 12:22 PM#5
MikeFit_NJ said:
Inter-laboratory variation comes from real methodological differences, not sloppiness: which reference standard was used and how it was itself…

Mine went the same way, slower.

Last edited: Jun 5, 2026 at 2:22 PM
31 1ben_calgary, patPC_UT, Dr.DermMIA and 28 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

⚠ Peptide Sciences SHUT DOWN March 6, 2026 — what happened and what to do now8 replies
⚠ Amino Asylum raided by FDA June 2025 — warehouse seized6 replies
⚠ Swiss Chems FDA warning letter December 2024 — selling unapproved drugs6 replies
⚠ 50+ FDA warning letters sent to peptide vendors in 2025 — full list4 replies
⚠ PeptideMeter exposed: some vendors scoring E grade on basic peptides4 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register