VendorMark said:I changed one thing, left everything else alone, and waited the full interval before looking.
Adding a me-too, because a thread of one person's experience is not much use. Nothing to add that would improve it.
VendorMark said:I changed one thing, left everything else alone, and waited the full interval before looking.
Coming at VendorMark’s question from a different direction. Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion. Almost every disagreement here turns out to be two people measuring different things and comparing the numbers anyway.
Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number. A figure without its method cannot be checked, and an unchecked figure is how this community accumulates folklore.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemA narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?
FDA_TrackerJim said:One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number.
Pushing back on FDA_TrackerJim here. Not convinced. The evidence being cited is consistent with the conclusion and also consistent with two other conclusions nobody has ruled out.