Dr.PulmRoch said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
Can confirm. Same sequence, different timescale. Posting only so the count is not one.
josh_phd_bmore said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
Pushing back on josh_phd_bmore here. Filing an objection on the n=1 problem. Personal experience is genuine evidence about one person and very weak evidence about anybody else, and this thread keeps promoting the first into the second.
If somebody has the primary source to hand I would rather cite it than paraphrase it.
josh_phd_bmore said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
True, with the qualification that this is a self-selected group. The people for whom it did not work post less, and that shapes everything we think we know.
That is the short version; the long version is somebody else's post.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL Biochemjosh_phd_bmore said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. Adding it to my notes with a link back to this thread.