Dr.LipidDallas said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction. Posting only so the count is not one.
Dr.LipidDallas said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction. Posting only so the count is not one.
Dr.LipidDallas said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.
The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way. Most of the apparent contradictions in these threads dissolve at that step.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemA narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
bri_stats said:If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way.
I read this differently from bri_stats, on substance rather than tone. I would resist the confidence. Half of what this board was certain about two years ago has since been quietly dropped, and nobody went back to correct the threads.