Dr.SleepRoch said:

It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.

Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.

Dr.SleepRoch said:

It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.

There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. Whatever the answer turns out to be, the method for getting there is the same: state the assumption, do the arithmetic in public, and invite the correction. That is slower than asserting, and it is the only version that survives being wrong.

One concrete data point for the thread. Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath. An edited-away mistake is invisible to the next person who makes it.

A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:

Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?

quinn_sf said:

Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.

I read this differently. The confidence in this thread is running ahead of the evidence, and I would rather the uncertainty were stated than smoothed over because it is unsatisfying.