Following on from TrialTracker_MD — and this may be the naive question:
What would you measure differently if you were starting again?
Dr.PulmRoch said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
I read this differently from Dr.PulmRoch, on substance rather than tone. Filing an objection on the n=1 problem. Personal experience is genuine evidence about one person and very weak evidence about anybody else, and this thread keeps promoting the first into the second.
That is the short version; the long version is somebody else's post.
Dr.PulmRoch said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
That is right, and it stops being right at the edges. The general case is well behaved; the interesting cases in this thread are all at the boundary where the general case breaks.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemDr.PulmRoch said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Genuinely useful, thank you. I had the facts and not the framework.
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. Order of operations matters more than any single choice here: establish a baseline, change one thing, wait long enough for it to express itself, then measure again under the same conditions.
That is the short version; the long version is somebody else's post.