NurseAsh_DET said:Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it.
Right, and the exception is worth naming rather than left implied, because the exception is where people get into trouble.
tommy_boulder said:Right, and one flattering data point from a group buy is not consistency.
Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it. Taking it to my next appointment.
NurseAsh_DET said:Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it.
I read this differently from NurseAsh_DET, on substance rather than tone. I think the framing smuggles in the conclusion. Ask it the other way round and the obvious answer reverses, which usually means the question is doing the work.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemOne concrete data point for the thread. Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath. An edited-away mistake is invisible to the next person who makes it.