Dr.PulmRoch said:Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it.
Agreed on the substance. I would put less weight on the timescale, because two months of anything is not enough to distinguish a trend from a wobble.
Dr.ReproEndo said:Right, and one flattering data point from a group buy is not consistency.
Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion. I will report back once I have actually tried it.
Dr.PulmRoch said:Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it.
I read this differently from Dr.PulmRoch, on substance rather than tone. The counter-case has not been addressed. Somebody upthread described the situation that does not fit, and the thread moved on rather than engaging with it, which is the failure mode this board is supposed to avoid.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemAdding the numbers, since they settle part of this. For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine. Half the figures circulating in this community trace back to a secondary summary that dropped a qualifier.