anna.melb_AU said:The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated.
Mine went the same way, slower. Nothing to add that would improve it.
anna.melb_AU said:The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated.
Mine went the same way, slower. Nothing to add that would improve it.
One thing that is still open after Dr.PeteFamMed’s answer:
How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?
DanielChem_CHI said:The boring version of this is the one that works, and the boring version is: measure a baseline, change one variable, wait, measure again under the…
This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. The counter-case has not been addressed. Somebody upthread described the situation that does not fit, and the thread moved on rather than engaging with it, which is the failure mode this board is supposed to avoid.
Happy to go further on any of that.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemDanielChem_CHI said:The boring version of this is the one that works, and the boring version is: measure a baseline, change one variable, wait, measure again under the…
Fair, and it stops being fair at the extremes. The middle of the range is well understood; the ends are where the honest answer is that nobody knows.
Moderator note: reminder that nothing in this thread is medical advice, and that clinical claims need a source. Carry on.