traveltech_sara said:The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated.
Mine went the same way, slower. Nothing to add that would improve it.
traveltech_sara said:The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated.
Coming at traveltech_sara’s question from a different direction. The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either. Those three things can all be true at once, and most arguments here are two people holding different parts of that.
Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine. Half the figures circulating in this community trace back to a secondary summary that dropped a qualifier.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsFollowing on from traveltech_sara — and this may be the naive question:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
Reporting back.
Reporting back for the archive rather than for the thread: I did the narrow version of what was suggested, gave it the full interval, and it settled. Posting it because threads without a follow-up are half a thread.