Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any. If nothing would, the discussion is not about evidence, and it is better to say so early than to spend nine posts discovering it.
TinaHashiRN said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
Mine went the same way, slower. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
TinaHashiRN said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it. The narrow version usually has an answer; the broad version usually does not, and answering the broad one is how a thread stops being useful.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsThe figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look. It is a small discipline and it changes what you notice.
One thing that is still open after TinaHashiRN’s answer:
Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?