sean_dublin said:Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it.
No disagreement, though the timescale matters more than the mechanism here. Most of what looks like a difference in kind turns out to be a difference in how long somebody waited.
HealthEcon_DC said:Right, and one flattering data point from a group buy is not consistency.
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.
sean_dublin said:Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it.
I read this differently from sean_dublin, on substance rather than tone. This treats a plausible mechanism as a demonstrated one. Plausible is where you start looking, not where you stop.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsOne concrete data point for the thread. If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself. Four weeks is the usual minimum for anything pharmacological on this board, and two weeks of data has told you almost nothing.
Moderator note: a post naming a supplier has been edited. Discuss suppliers in the review sections, not here.