DeniseRN_TPA said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Second this.
DeniseRN_TPA said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Second this.
Reporting back.
For the archive: it took about six weeks rather than the two I expected, and the difference between those two numbers was the whole of my problem.
One concrete data point for the thread. If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself. Four weeks is the usual minimum for anything pharmacological on this board, and two weeks of data has told you almost nothing.
Happy to go further on any of that.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsFollowing on from DeniseRN_TPA — and this may be the naive question:
What would you measure differently if you were starting again?
Dr.PathRoch said:If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.
I do not accept the framing. The question has been narrowed to the version that has a tidy answer, and the part that was dropped is the part the OP actually asked about.