One thing that is still open after NurseAsh_DET’s answer:

Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?

BiostatsBrad said:

Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.

This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. The counter-case has not been addressed. Somebody upthread described the situation that does not fit, and the thread moved on rather than engaging with it, which is the failure mode this board is supposed to avoid.

BiostatsBrad said:

Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.

That holds where the measurement is reliable. Where it is noisy — and a lot of what gets tracked here is noisy — the same reasoning produces confident nonsense.

BiostatsBrad said:

Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.

Bookmarking. The distinction being drawn above is the one nobody else makes.

From the other side of the consultation, briefly. The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person. Both are real; they answer different questions and get quoted as if they were the same one.