🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsBuyer Beware⚠ 50+ FDA warning letters sent to peptide vendors in 2025 — need advice Page 3

⚠ 50+ FDA warning letters sent to peptide vendors in 2025 — need advice

MarkLI_maint Fri, May 3, 2024 at 2:07 AM 16 replies 2,234 viewsPage 3 of 4
Dr.MetabolicMD
VIP Member
2,345
16,789
Jan 2024
Rochester, MN
May 4, 2024 at 9:06 PM#11
PedsEndoPhilly said:
Almost every unanswerable question in these threads is unanswerable because three things changed in the same fortnight, and no amount of subsequent…

That is right for the common case. Whether it is right for the case being asked about depends on a detail that has not been given.

Last edited: May 4, 2024 at 11:06 PM
7 5SleepDoc_PDX, RegAffairsDC, BiostatsBrad and 4 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
hank_denver
Member
278
1,234
Sep 2024
Denver, CO
May 5, 2024 at 10:49 PM#12
pete_RVA said:
Right, and one flattering data point from a group buy is not consistency.

Thank you — that is the clearest version of this I have read, and I have read a lot of them. I will report back once I have actually tried it.

Last edited: May 6, 2024 at 2:49 AM
8 6raj_cambridge, ingrid_STO, pete_nash and 5 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
pete_nash
Member
312
1,345
Aug 2024
Nashville, TN
May 7, 2024 at 12:33 AM#13
PedsEndoPhilly said:
Almost every unanswerable question in these threads is unanswerable because three things changed in the same fortnight, and no amount of subsequent…

Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.

Last edited: May 7, 2024 at 6:33 AM
9 7mike_mod, SarahChen_PharmD, sarah.morrison and 6 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
VendorMark
Senior Member
3,456
14,567
Jan 2024
Texas
Online
May 8, 2024 at 2:17 AM#14

Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine. Half the figures circulating in this community trace back to a secondary summary that dropped a qualifier.

Correct me if the detail matters more than I have assumed.

10 8Dr.PeteFamMed, claudia_zurich, nancy_portland and 7 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
mike_mod
Moderator
7,234
19,823
Nov 2023
New York
Online
May 9, 2024 at 4:02 AM#15

Moderator note: reminder that nothing in this thread is medical advice, and that clinical claims need a source. Carry on.

Last edited: May 9, 2024 at 6:02 AM
11 9PurityPaulOR, MaxMetOK, MounjBrad and 8 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

⚠ Peptide Sciences SHUT DOWN March 6, 2026 — what happened and what to do now8 replies
⚠ Amino Asylum raided by FDA June 2025 — warehouse seized6 replies
⚠ Swiss Chems FDA warning letter December 2024 — selling unapproved drugs6 replies
⚠ 50+ FDA warning letters sent to peptide vendors in 2025 — full list4 replies
⚠ PeptideMeter exposed: some vendors scoring E grade on basic peptides4 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register