Dr.PulmRoch said:Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth.
Dr.PulmRoch said:Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it.
Coming at Dr.PulmRoch’s question from a different direction. Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion. Almost every disagreement here turns out to be two people measuring different things and comparing the numbers anyway.
Moderator note: reminder that nothing in this thread is medical advice, and that clinical claims need a source. Thread quality here is what the rules are for. Keep it up.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsA narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
What would you measure differently if you were starting again?
adam_van said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. Pushing back on the anecdote-stacking. Twenty people reporting the same thing is twenty samples from the same self-selected pool, not twenty independent confirmations.