GraceAZ_72 said:For the archive: it took about six weeks rather than the two I expected, and the difference between those two numbers was the whole of my problem.
I am going to disagree with the direction of travel here. The thread has converged on the tidiest answer rather than the best-supported one, and those are not the same thing.
Happy to go further on any of that.
GraceAZ_72 said:For the archive: it took about six weeks rather than the two I expected, and the difference between those two numbers was the whole of my problem.
That is right, and it stops being right at the edges. The general case is well behaved; the interesting cases in this thread are all at the boundary where the general case breaks.
GraceAZ_72 said:For the archive: it took about six weeks rather than the two I expected, and the difference between those two numbers was the whole of my problem.
Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsFrom the other side of the consultation, briefly. There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.
TrialTracker_MD said:There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.
Same pattern here, and in the same order. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.