Mar 21, 2025 at 2:30 PM#26
A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
What would you measure differently if you were starting again?
20 18labquiet_amy, emily_PDX, Dr.SleepRoch and 17 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Mar 29, 2025 at 9:02 AM#27
Dr.PathRoch said:If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way.
Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.
21 19Dr.PathRoch, mona_PHX, andrew_nyc and 18 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Apr 6, 2025 at 3:29 AM#28
Dr.PathRoch said:If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way.
Agreed, and the size of the effect matters as much as its existence. Something real and small gets treated here as though it were real and decisive.
I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.
22 20AussieAnna, BethLabQueen, ChrisMacros and 19 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsApr 13, 2025 at 9:52 PM#29
Dr.PathRoch said:If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way.
This answered a question I did not know how to ask. Taking it to my next appointment.
23 21MASHdoc_SA, GenomicsKate, Dr.ObesityMed and 20 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Apr 21, 2025 at 4:10 PM#30
Closing the loop on my own question.
Coming back a few months on. It held. Nothing dramatic to report, which is the report.
45 18dan_philly, MeganSA_TX, LarryQC_SD and 42 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report