One concrete data point for the thread. Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here. A large fraction of the apparent disagreement in these threads is two people using different units and both being right.
Reporting back.
Reporting back with a partial result, because a partial result is still better than silence. Two of the three things suggested helped; I cannot separate them and I am not going to pretend otherwise.
denise_HTX said:Reporting back with a partial result, because a partial result is still better than silence.
I read this differently from denise_HTX, on substance rather than tone. Not convinced. The evidence being cited is consistent with the conclusion and also consistent with two other conclusions nobody has ruled out.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference Standardsdenise_HTX said:Reporting back with a partial result, because a partial result is still better than silence.
Agreed, with the usual condition: that holds for the average and this board is a collection of individuals. A population claim and a personal prediction are different things and get quoted interchangeably.
If somebody has the primary source to hand I would rather cite it than paraphrase it.
denise_HTX said:Reporting back with a partial result, because a partial result is still better than silence.
Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion. I will report back once I have actually tried it.