One thing that is still open after Dr.CardioMD’s answer:
Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?
denise_HTX said:Update, and it is the boring outcome: nothing was wrong.
Careful with the causal language. Two things moving together in a period when five things changed is not a mechanism, and stating it as one makes the thread less useful to somebody reading it later.
denise_HTX said:Update, and it is the boring outcome: nothing was wrong.
That is right for the common case. Whether it is right for the case being asked about depends on a detail that has not been given.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference Standardsdenise_HTX said:Update, and it is the boring outcome: nothing was wrong.
Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it.
Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. Take it one variable at a time. Almost every unanswerable question in these threads is unanswerable because three things changed in the same fortnight, and no amount of subsequent argument can untangle them after the fact.