PharmacoVig_BOS said:

Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.

This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. Pushing back on the consensus forming here. Consistency is not the same as correctness, and a board that agrees with itself quickly is usually agreeing with the first person who sounded certain.

PharmacoVig_BOS said:

Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.

That is right for the common case. Whether it is right for the case being asked about depends on a detail that has not been given.

PharmacoVig_BOS said:

Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.

Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.

From the other side of the consultation, briefly. The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions. Agreeing that something happens says nothing about whether it happens enough to act on.

Worth separating that from cost and coverage, which this thread keeps folding into the same question. They behave differently and the advice does not transfer.

That is the short version; the long version is somebody else's post.

PharmD_Rodriguez said:

The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.

Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction.