🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsMetabolic Health & DiabetesType 1.5 diabetes (LADA) and GLP-1 — May 2025

Type 1.5 diabetes (LADA) and GLP-1 — May 2025

WendyG_ATL Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 9:03 PM 12 replies 1,944 viewsPage 1 of 3
This thread is more than 24 months old. Information may be outdated. Consider searching for more recent discussions.
WendyG_ATL
Member
1,023
5,678
Apr 2024
Georgia
Jun 12, 2024 at 9:03 PM#1

A1C went from 7.4 to 5.6 over nine months and my prescriber was more interested in the fasting insulin, which I did not expect.

Because it is glucose-dependent, this class carries a low intrinsic hypoglycaemia risk on its own — the risk arrives when it is combined with insulin or a sulfonylurea, which usually need reducing.

What I am trying to establish is why A1C lags the way it does, and what to look at in the meantime if you want to know sooner.

I would rather have one careful answer than five confident ones.

12 7Dr.SurgeonPGH, rachel_ABQ, traveltech_sara and 9 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
JennaRN
Senior Member
1,987
8,923
Mar 2024
Colorado
Online
Jun 12, 2024 at 9:54 PM#2
WendyG_ATL said:
A1C went from 7.4 to 5.6 over nine months and my prescriber was more interested in the fasting insulin, which I did not expect.

Fasting insulin is the lab my functional medicine doctor cares about most for glycaemic control: it's a much earlier marker of metabolic dysfunction than glucose or A1C.

My fasting insulin: 27 → 13 → 5 uIU/mL over 9 months. Target is <7. By the time your fasting glucose is elevated, your insulin has been elevated for YEARS trying to compensate.

Ask your doctor to include fasting insulin in your bloodwork panel. It's cheap (~$20) and incredibly informative.

11 6PeptideSynthNJ, Dr.KarenChen, Dr.NateNeph and 8 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
kim_atl_prep
Member
312
1,345
Aug 2024
Atlanta, GA
Jun 12, 2024 at 10:45 PM#3
JennaRN said:
Fasting insulin is the lab my functional medicine doctor cares about most for glycaemic control: it's a much earlier marker of metabolic dysfunction…

PCOS success story with glycaemic control: as someone with polycystic ovary syndrome, this medication has been transformative beyond weight loss.

After 11 months: periods became regular for the first time in a decade, testosterone levels normalized, acne cleared significantly, and — unexpectedly — my fertility specialist is optimistic about future conception.

GLP-1 agonists address the insulin resistance at the root of PCOS. For PCOS patients, this isn't "just" a weight loss drug — it's treating our underlying metabolic dysfunction.

Last edited: Jun 13, 2024 at 4:45 AM
10 5RegAffairsDC, BiostatsBrad, PeptideSynthNJ and 7 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
maya_sedona
Member
289
1,234
Sep 2024
Sedona, AZ
Jun 12, 2024 at 11:36 PM#4
WendyG_ATL said:
A1C went from 7.4 to 5.6 over nine months and my prescriber was more interested in the fasting insulin, which I did not expect.

This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth.

9 4MikeKY_noInsulin, Dr.RaviCardio, jennifer_SEA and 6 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.NateNeph
VIP Member
2,987
16,234
Dec 2023
Houston, TX
Jun 13, 2024 at 4:22 AM#5

Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice.

Patient selection optimization for glycaemic control: emerging predictive biomarkers for GLP-1 agonist response include:

BiomarkerAssociationEvidence Level
Baseline BMIHigher BMI → greater absolute weight lossStrong
Fasting insulinHigher insulin → better responseModerate
GLP1R gene variantsrs6923761 → variable responsePreliminary
Baseline hsCRPHigher CRP → greater CV benefitModerate
Early weight loss (4 wk)≥3% at 4 wks → strong predictor of ≥10% at 68 wksStrong

The 4-week early responder criterion is the most clinically actionable: if you haven't lost ≥3% by week 4 at a therapeutic dose, discuss optimization strategies with your provider.

Last edited: Jun 13, 2024 at 6:22 AM
8 3RickReta_CO, PharmHunterJen, TomTeleRx and 5 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

SUSTAIN-6 to SELECT — the cardiovascular evidence timeline14 replies
GLP-1 and insulin resistance — HOMA-IR improvement data17 replies
Metabolic syndrome reversal criteria — how GLP-1 addresses all 55 replies
A1C target achievement rates — sema vs tirz comparison8 replies
SURPASS-CVOT: tirzepatide cardiovascular outcomes trial design3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register