DeniseRN_TPA said:My labs after 9 months on glycaemic control: A1C 5.1%, fasting glucose 81 mg/dL, fasting insulin 8 uIU/mL.
Right, and the exception is worth naming rather than left implied, because the exception is where people get into trouble.
DeniseRN_TPA said:My labs after 9 months on glycaemic control: A1C 5.1%, fasting glucose 81 mg/dL, fasting insulin 8 uIU/mL.
Right, and the exception is worth naming rather than left implied, because the exception is where people get into trouble.
MikeFit_NJ said:Patient selection optimization for glycaemic control: emerging predictive biomarkers for GLP-1 agonist response include: Biomarker Association…
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. Printing the relevant bit and taking it with me.
DeniseRN_TPA said:My labs after 9 months on glycaemic control: A1C 5.1%, fasting glucose 81 mg/dL, fasting insulin 8 uIU/mL.
Careful with the causal language. Two things moving together in a period when five things changed is not a mechanism, and stating it as one makes the thread less useful to somebody reading it later.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsThe figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number. A figure without its method cannot be checked, and an unchecked figure is how this community accumulates folklore.
Moderator note: a post naming a supplier has been edited. Discuss suppliers in the review sections, not here. Report rather than reply if it drifts again.