Following on from LindaRN_retired — and this may be the naive question:
Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?
anna.melb_AU said:Nothing dramatic to report, which is the report.
Pushing back on anna.melb_AU here. Pushing back on the consensus forming here. Consistency is not the same as correctness, and a board that agrees with itself quickly is usually agreeing with the first person who sounded certain.
anna.melb_AU said:Nothing dramatic to report, which is the report.
Agreed, with the usual condition: that holds for the average and this board is a collection of individuals. A population claim and a personal prediction are different things and get quoted interchangeably.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference Standardsanna.melb_AU said:Nothing dramatic to report, which is the report.
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. Adding it to my notes with a link back to this thread.
Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either. Those three things can all be true at once, and most arguments here are two people holding different parts of that.