Jun 5, 2026 at 3:45 AM#21
A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
What would you measure differently if you were starting again?
10 10DadBodDave, AmyNC_wife, SkepticalSean and 7 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Jun 5, 2026 at 11:56 PM#22
Dr.PainCLE said:If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not.
This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. The objection nobody has made: this only works if the measurement is doing what we assume it is doing, and that assumption has not been tested here.
Last edited: Jun 6, 2026 at 12:56 AM
9 9Dr.PulmRoch, maya_sedona, stefan_berlin and 6 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Jun 6, 2026 at 8:07 PM#23
Dr.PainCLE said:If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not.
True, with the qualification that this is a self-selected group. The people for whom it did not work post less, and that shapes everything we think we know.
8 8NicoleRaleigh, james_edin, FranDenver and 5 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsJun 7, 2026 at 4:17 PM#24
Dr.PainCLE said:If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not.
This answered a question I did not know how to ask. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.
7 7B12Beth, RickReta_CO, PharmHunterJen and 4 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Jun 8, 2026 at 12:26 PM#25
Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions. Agreeing that something happens says nothing about whether it happens enough to act on.
6 6NurseAsh_DET, BenResearch_OR, MikeKY_noInsulin and 3 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report