Mar 29, 2024 at 7:26 PM#91
CarlaRPh_TPA said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
Can confirm. Same sequence, different timescale.
18 18Dr.LeslieOBGYN, MikeNYC_runner and 15 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Mar 30, 2024 at 5:18 AM#92
CarlaRPh_TPA said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion. Almost every disagreement here turns out to be two people measuring different things and comparing the numbers anyway.
Last edited: Mar 30, 2024 at 11:18 AM
17 17pete_RVA, CarlaRPh_TPA, steph_laguna and 14 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Mar 30, 2024 at 3:10 PM#93
One concrete data point for the thread. Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason. In three months the reason is what you will have forgotten, and the reason is what makes the record worth having.
Last edited: Mar 30, 2024 at 6:10 PM
16 16DataDave, Dr.GutHealth, amsterdam_pete and 13 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsMar 31, 2024 at 2:02 AM#94
A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?
15 15dan_philly, MeganSA_TX, LarryQC_SD and 12 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Mar 31, 2024 at 10:54 AM#95
PharmacoVig_BOS said:Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.
This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. Pushing back on the anecdote-stacking. Twenty people reporting the same thing is twenty samples from the same self-selected pool, not twenty independent confirmations.
14 14NicoleRaleigh, james_edin, FranDenver and 11 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report