Nov 27, 2025 at 4:19 PM#21
emily_PDX said:True, with the qualification that this is a self-selected group.
Can confirm. Same sequence, different timescale.
21 21NeuroNate, JessicaH_TX, KevinCompounds and 18 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dec 3, 2025 at 4:05 PM#22
emily_PDX said:True, with the qualification that this is a self-selected group.
There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any. If nothing would, the discussion is not about evidence, and it is better to say so early than to spend nine posts discovering it.
Last edited: Dec 3, 2025 at 6:05 PM
20 20MikeFit_NJ, InsuranceTom, WendyG_ATL and 17 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dec 9, 2025 at 3:47 PM#23
Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason. In three months the reason is what you will have forgotten, and the reason is what makes the record worth having.
19 19AussieAnna, BethLabQueen, ChrisMacros and 16 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsDec 15, 2025 at 3:26 PM#24
Following on from emily_PDX — and this may be the naive question:
Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?
18 18JenMemphis, pat_auckland, Dr.GastroMayo and 15 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dec 21, 2025 at 3:01 PM#25
anders_CPH said:Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.
I do not accept the framing. The question has been narrowed to the version that has a tidy answer, and the part that was dropped is the part the OP actually asked about.
That is the short version; the long version is somebody else's post.
Last edited: Dec 21, 2025 at 4:01 PM
17 17carl_compliance, DanielChem_CHI, marco_milano and 14 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report