Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.

BethLabQueen said:

One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number.

Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it. I will report back once I have actually tried it.

Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion. Almost every disagreement here turns out to be two people measuring different things and comparing the numbers anyway.

DeniseRN_TPA said:

Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.

Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.

Moderator note: leaving this open. It is being argued well and the disagreement is the useful part.