EndoResFellow said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Same pattern here, and in the same order. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
kate.chem said:One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number.
I am going to disagree with the direction of travel here. The thread has converged on the tidiest answer rather than the best-supported one, and those are not the same thing.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View Resultskate.chem said:One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number.
Correct, and worth adding that it is reversible. Nothing being described here is a one-way door, which changes how cautious it is reasonable to be.
Moderator note: leaving this open. It is being argued well and the disagreement is the useful part. Tagging this one for the weekly digest.