denise_HTX said:Follow-up — I put something in the gap where food used to be rather than waiting for the gap to close on its own.
Mine went the same way, slower.
denise_HTX said:Follow-up — I put something in the gap where food used to be rather than waiting for the gap to close on its own.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked. Narrow it and it becomes tractable; leave it broad and the thread will produce nine confident and incompatible replies.
The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself. Four weeks is the usual minimum for anything pharmacological on this board, and two weeks of data has told you almost nothing.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsFollowing on from denise_HTX — and this may be the naive question:
Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?
LabKate said:If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.
This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. This treats a plausible mechanism as a demonstrated one. Plausible is where you start looking, not where you stop.