Following on from lisa_labSD — and this may be the naive question:
How long did you give it before you decided it was working?
Following on from lisa_labSD — and this may be the naive question:
How long did you give it before you decided it was working?
raj_cambridge said:Follow-up: I read the paper rather than the summary and the qualifier I was missing was in the second paragraph of the results.
Pushing back on raj_cambridge here. The counter-case has not been addressed. Somebody upthread described the situation that does not fit, and the thread moved on rather than engaging with it, which is the failure mode this board is supposed to avoid.
raj_cambridge said:Follow-up: I read the paper rather than the summary and the qualifier I was missing was in the second paragraph of the results.
Correct as far as it goes. The part it does not cover is what to do when the honest answer is "not enough data", which is more often than anyone likes.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View Resultsraj_cambridge said:Follow-up: I read the paper rather than the summary and the qualifier I was missing was in the second paragraph of the results.
That reframing is the part I needed.
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.