Short answer first, then the reasoning. Take it one variable at a time. Almost every unanswerable question in these threads is unanswerable because three things changed in the same fortnight, and no amount of subsequent argument can untangle them after the fact.
Alcohol simply stopped appealing, which I did not expect and which has been more socially complicated than the weight loss.
The question I want answered is whether the change in tolerance is the smaller stomach, the smaller body, or something central, and whether it settles.
Not looking for reassurance. Looking for the part I have got wrong.
mike.trainer_LA said:Almost every unanswerable question in these threads is unanswerable because three things changed in the same fortnight, and no amount of subsequent…
That is right, and it stops being right at the edges. The general case is well behaved; the interesting cases in this thread are all at the boundary where the general case breaks.
PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsTirzTom said:Alcohol simply stopped appealing, which I did not expect and which has been more socially complicated than the weight loss.
Adding a me-too, because a thread of one person's experience is not much use.
Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either. Those three things can all be true at once, and most arguments here are two people holding different parts of that.