A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
What would you measure differently if you were starting again?
DeniseRN_TPA said:The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either.
I am going to disagree with the direction of travel here. The thread has converged on the tidiest answer rather than the best-supported one, and those are not the same thing.
DeniseRN_TPA said:The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either.
True, and it depends on a baseline nobody has stated. Without knowing where someone started, the same number can be an excellent result or a disappointing one.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsDeniseRN_TPA said:The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either.
Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion. I will report back once I have actually tried it.
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it. The narrow version usually has an answer; the broad version usually does not, and answering the broad one is how a thread stops being useful.