Dr.NateNeph said:Whatever the answer turns out to be, the method for getting there is the same: state the assumption, do the arithmetic in public, and invite the…
Second this. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
PeptideChemSF said:One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number.
Pushing back on PeptideChemSF here. Filing an objection on the n=1 problem. Personal experience is genuine evidence about one person and very weak evidence about anybody else, and this thread keeps promoting the first into the second.
PeptideChemSF said:One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number.
Right, and the exception is worth naming rather than left implied, because the exception is where people get into trouble.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsPeptideChemSF said:One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number.
This answered a question I did not know how to ask. Adding it to my notes with a link back to this thread.
Moderator note: leaving this open. It is being argued well and the disagreement is the useful part. Tagging this one for the weekly digest.