quinn_sf said:Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.
Agreed on the substance. I would put less weight on the timescale, because two months of anything is not enough to distinguish a trend from a wobble.
quinn_sf said:Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.
Bookmarking. The distinction being drawn above is the one nobody else makes. Adding it to my notes with a link back to this thread.
Moderator note: reminder that nothing in this thread is medical advice, and that clinical claims need a source. Thread quality here is what the rules are for. Keep it up.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsJennaRN said:I would put less weight on the timescale, because two months of anything is not enough to distinguish a trend from a wobble.
Same pattern here, and in the same order. Nothing to add that would improve it.
JennaRN said:I would put less weight on the timescale, because two months of anything is not enough to distinguish a trend from a wobble.
Coming at JennaRN’s question from a different direction. The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person. Both are real; they answer different questions and get quoted as if they were the same one.