anna.melb_AU said:

The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.

Mine went the same way, slower. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.

anna.melb_AU said:

The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.

Coming at anna.melb_AU’s question from a different direction. Order of operations matters more than any single choice here: establish a baseline, change one thing, wait long enough for it to express itself, then measure again under the same conditions.

Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself. Four weeks is the usual minimum for anything pharmacological on this board, and two weeks of data has told you almost nothing.

Following on from anna.melb_AU — and this may be the naive question:

What would you measure differently if you were starting again?

Reporting back.

Follow-up — I put something in the gap where food used to be rather than waiting for the gap to close on its own. That was the part nobody told me.