One concrete data point for the thread. One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number. A figure without its method cannot be checked, and an unchecked figure is how this community accumulates folklore.
Following on from Dr.GastroMayo — and this may be the naive question:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
jason_paloalto said:One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about. A precise question gets a precise answer; a general one gets everybody’s favourite anecdote.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsReporting back.
Coming back a few months on. It held. Nothing dramatic to report, which is the report.
hyun_seoul said:It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.
Agreed, and the size of the effect matters as much as its existence. Something real and small gets treated here as though it were real and decisive.