Dr.Martinez said:It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
Dr.Martinez said:It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
Dr.Martinez said:It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.
There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either. Those three things can all be true at once, and most arguments here are two people holding different parts of that.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsOne thing that is still open after Dr.Martinez’s answer:
How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?
Dr.ObesityMed said:The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either.
I read this differently from Dr.ObesityMed, on substance rather than tone. I would resist the confidence. Half of what this board was certain about two years ago has since been quietly dropped, and nobody went back to correct the threads.